Thursday, September 27, 2012

SOCMA: US keen to tap into gas supply

http://www.icis.com/Articles/2012/10/01/9599041/socma-us-keen-to-tap-into-gas-supply.html


27 September 2012 10:53  [Source: ICB]

Some political leaders and many in manufacturing outside the chemical industry do not fully appreciate the huge potential of shale gas as a game changer for the US economy, according to an executive from the country's second largest natural gas producer, Chesapeake Energy Corporation.


Bill Wince
"From the beginning of 2013 we'll start to see those dollars rolling in"
Bill WinceVice president of business development, Chesapeake
According to Chesapeake, US gas resources are so vast that production could be doubled from current levels. However, this will only happen if gas prices return to levels that make gas drilling viable - somewhere in the $4-6/MMBtu range, substantially higher than the levels seen today.

At these prices, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGLs) would still be a very attractive resource for the chemical industry and other industrial sectors, Chesapeake says.

Bill Wince, vice president of business development for Chesapeake, points out that the petrochemical industry uses natural gas for process energy and NGLs like ethane and propane as a feedstock. With such a comprehensive use of natural gas for its operations, the chemical industry benefits significantly from increased resource availability and ­modest prices.

He believes the chemical manufacturers that are adding NGL cracking capacity in the US have a great opportunity to capture value through exports.

"Though there are no restrictions on exporting raw NGLs, those who can process raw NGLs in the US have excellent opportunities to market their products in higher priced global markets," he adds.

Smaller and specialty chemical manufacturers will also have much more attractive input costs thanks to shale gas. "Our message is that you'll have a real advantage in the US and you need to be looking at ways to take ­advantage of that for domestic markets and for export."

The figures speak for themselves: following years of decline, industrial demand for gas has grown each year for the past three years as prices have fallen. "Those who can switch to gas have done so. But some of the fundamental shifts take time because they require new investments," says Wince.

Lower natural gas prices have generated significant new demand opportunities in the US, he says. The most immediate demand response has been in the power sector, as low gas prices have allowed gas-fired generation to displace coal.

Mothballed fertiliser plants have been brought back on stream, and methanol facilities have been debottlenecked. Over the longer term, he says, capacity additions from ammonia producers for fertilisers and urea, as well as methanol producers, will add significant new baseload industrial demand.

Wince says: "You begin to see some major projects under construction, so from a construction perspective the early-movers will have an advantage. From the beginning of 2013 we'll start to see those dollars rolling in."

Gas will also see increasing use in transportation: "People believe there has been a fundamental change in the relationship between petroleum prices and natural gas prices," he says. Truck engine manufacturers like Cummins and Westport are developing engines to burn liquefied natural gas (LNG), as are locomotive builders such as Caterpillar and GE.

VOLATILITY DECLINES

Investors like to make long-term decisions based on predictable conditions and, according to Wince, price volatility for natural gas and NGLs is already decreasing thanks to all the investment in infrastructure and increased supply.

He says: "In the past, price spikes were often weather-driven. We would ramp up rigs in response, but this would involve going out and finding the gas. Today, we've found the gas and future drilling will be driven by ­pricing signals - that has effectively dampened volatility."

In the past a lot of natural gas supply was offshore so it was subject to hurricane ­interruptions. Tight and shale gas is all onshore so the impact is much less pronounced. "Katrina was a huge event for pricing; we think shale insulates the US from that volatility," says Wince.

There has been a huge amount of investment in gas exploration and production in the US over the past few years, enabling producers to deliver gas in a much more flexible and reliable way, thereby cutting volatility.

"Our prices have traded down slowly over 3-4 years. But we had a very hot summer and difficult winters before this last one. These would have caused price spiking in the past but we had virtually none," he says.

Wince adds: "You can make investment decisions based on a presumption of lower volatility in gas markets. Investors should be confident that the long-term equilibrium price will be favourable versus alternative fuels and absolute prices ought to be more stable than in the past."

UNSUSTAINABLE PRICES

However, Chesapeake sounds a note of caution over current pricing. It believes a price of $4-6/MMBtu may be viable for producers and consumers in the intermediate term. With prices currently tanking below $3/MMBtu and below $4/MMBtu for the whole of this year, the number of gas rigs has fallen from 1,400 to 452 between 2008 and 2012.

Chesapeake is not planning to increase its number of gas rigs until it gets the right price signals. It has significantly curtailed capital expenditure investment in dry gas shale plays. Its budget has been adjusted so it spends more on oil and NGL exploration ­instead.

"We don't think the US can survive on incremental gas production from wet gas plays alone, whose higher value liquids make ­drilling economic at lower gas prices. Most dry gas plays don't become economic until prices are above $4/MMBtu. A lot of gas can be found at $6 and less, so $5 is a good midpoint," says Wince.

Chesapeake believes natural gas prices will self-correct in the long run and make exploration and production viable again. A record inventory of natural gas in storage in the US is now being worked off via coal-to-gas ­switching in the power sector, and that will continue through the end of this year, it says. Having bounced back from historic lows, they expect prices to increase late this year or early in 2013.

On the NGL side, Wince adds: "A lot of ethane crackers had gone into maintenance in the first half of 2012. Supply has been growing but part of the NGL price falls have been due to plant turnarounds this year. Nevertheless, supply growth will outpace demand until new crackers come online in the second half of this decade, so prices may remain ­modest."

Wince is confident that the $4-6/MMBtu natural gas price attractive to chemical producers can be sustained. He expects producers will return to dry gas plays in force when prices incentivise new drillings.

"The nominal price might increase because of inflation but adjusted should stay favourable versus all other fuel sources well beyond the next decade.

"Some in government and industry still don't recognise what an incredible resource we have and how we should leverage it. There are so many opportunities to underpin new jobs and real economic growth," says Wince.

As an independent oil and gas producer, Chesapeake is investing in research to boost the use of natural gas rather than conventional petroleum-based fuels in cars and heavy vehicles. It is also trying to encourage utilities to increase gas usage.

The company has also taken a 50% stake in biofuels group Sundrop Fuels, which uses natural gas and biomass to create transportation fuels. Wince adds: "The shale gas revolution is expanding to include more than just shale gas. Technology is being used in older oil and gas zones, which we call non-conventional or tight zones."

The new zones have become extremely important over the last 2-3 years, he says. "We've seen shale and associated drilling begin to focus away from typical dry gas zones and rig counts are now increasing in areas like Eagleford and the wet gas portion of Marcellus. The economics for wet gas, oil and condensate drilling have become better as we've adapted drilling techniques used to develop the dry gas plays."

By: Will Beacham
+44 20 8652 3214

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Moret: Louisiana continues to outperform South and U.S.

http://www.thetowntalk.com/article/20120926/OPINION/209260317

12:19 PM, Sep 26, 2012
Written by Stephen Moret 
Over the last four years, despite facing a deep national economic downturn and harmful policies of the Obama administration that have constrained our growth, Louisiana has significantly outperformed the South and U.S.
Only six states in our country have more jobs today than in January 2008. Louisiana and Texas are the only two such states in the South. In fact, Louisiana's job growth has been second fastest in the South since 2008, and third fastest over the last 12 months.



Per-capita personal income in Louisiana has increased by more than $2,700 over the last four years, improving our national ranking to its highest level in more than 80 years.


According to the U.S. Census, for more than 20 consecutive years, more people moved out of Louisiana than moved in, but for the past four years in a row, more people moved into Louisiana than moved out. People are voting with their feet and moving here because Louisiana has experienced job growth while most other states have experienced job losses.



Two significant contributors to Louisiana's relative economic performance have been our state's dramatic business climate improvements, as well as our aggressive business retention, expansion and recruitment efforts.


Since 2008, Louisiana has improved to its highest-ever position on every major national ranking of state business climates, and we have secured projects that are creating more than 51,500 new jobs and more than $12.6 billion in new capital investment.


We've helped secure a variety of economic development wins right here in Central Louisiana. For example, Sundrop Fuels plans to break ground by early 2013 on a $450 million biofuels refinery, which will result in 150 direct jobs with average salaries of about $58,000, plus benefits, as well as approximately 1,150 indirect jobs.


JELD-WEN, with state assistance for workforce recruitment and training, will open a $120 million facility that will create at least 75 new, direct jobs. Sutherland Global Services is creating 600 new jobs at its new business process outsourcing center. With state assistance, P&G recently completed a $100 million expansion, creating more than 100 new jobs.
 
 

Friday, September 14, 2012

INTERVIEW: LanzaTech Seeks Partners for Waste-To-Jet Fuel Project

http://www.foxbusiness.com/news/2012/09/14/interview-lanzatech-seeks-partners-for-waste-to-jet-fuel-project/

Fram Renewable Fuels Invests $91 Million To Expand Its Manufacturing Facility In Hazlehurst, Georgia

http://www.areadevelopment.com/newsItems/9-14-2012/fram-renewable-fuels-expansion-jeff-davis-county-hazlehurst-georgia883351.shtml

Area Development Online News Desk (09/14/2012)

Fram Renewable Fuels, a company that supplies of wood pellet fuel, will invest $91 million to expand its operations and open a second production plant in the Jeff Davis County city of Hazlehurst, Georgia, creating 80 new jobs.

“Alternative energy manufacturers such as Fram Renewable Fuels help keep Georgia top of mind as a strategic location for this industry, increasing our prominence around the world as a go-to location for these businesses,” Gov. Nathan Deal said. “Georgia is fortunate to have an abundance of forestry resources for Fram to expand its wood pellet operations, and meet the growing needs of its global customers.”

Headquartered in Richmond Hill, Fram Renewable Fuels currently operates Appling County Pellets in Baxley, a few miles east of its proposed plant in Hazlehurst. Fram said its new plant in Hazlehurst will help the company meet the expanded needs of its customers in Europe that use wood pellets for energy utilities. This plant will have a total production capacity of 500,000 metric tons of wood pellets per year, and will use pine logs and sawmill residuals as feedstock. Upon completion of the new manufacturing plant, Fram will be positioned among the top wood pellet export companies in the United States, exporting more than 900,000 metric tons of wood pellets annually.

“This is another step toward Fram’s mission to be a significant, reliable and cost effective supplier of wood pellets, and we are very happy that we were able to locate in an area where we already have roots,” said Fram President Harold Arnold. “The pellet business will continue to be a learning process and is no ‘walk in the park.’”

Fram’s Hazlehurst wood pellet manufacturing plant will be strategically located in South Georgia’s “wood basket,” providing efficient access to that region’s raw materials and other forestry products. This location also provides the company with convenient access by rail to the Port of Brunswick, where Fram will export its finished wood pellets to Europe from the port’s Logistec Terminal.

The Governor’s Office said in addition to the direct jobs to be created, this expansion is expected to lead to the creation of indirect job opportunities in South Georgia’s forestry industry to support the new pellet plant as increased amounts of wood are harvested to supply the plant. These new opportunities are expected to have a near-immediate impact in communities throughout this region of the state.

The Georgia Department of Economic Development said it collaborated with the Joint Development Authority of Jeff Davis County, Hazlehurst and Denton to manage this project, which also received a loan guarantee from the US Department of Agriculture as part of a Farm Bill to support establishment of renewable energy.

“This expansion is significant not only for Fram Renewable Fuels, but also for Georgia’s growing alternative energy sector,” said GDEcD Commissioner Chris Cummiskey. “From our plentiful natural resources to our high-performing logistics infrastructure, Georgia is uniquely positioned to be the best place for wood pellet manufacturers to operate. As the global demand for this product grows, we look forward to partnering with Fram and others in this industry to create future opportunities.”

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Landowners’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Aspirations Towards Woody Biomass Markets in North Carolina

http://cnr.ncsu.edu/blogs/news/2012/09/11/landowners-knowledge-attitudes-and-aspirations-towards-woody-biomass-markets-in-north-carolina/

2012 September 11
 
by CNR Communications
 

NC Cooperative Extension Logo - Empowering People - Providing Service

A training model for woody biomass landowner training is the result of a survey conducted by Extension Forestry and the Department of Agricultural and Extension Education at NC State University.  The study is  featured in the August 2012 edition of the Journal of Extension.

Non-industrial private forest (NIPF) landowners are often not included in discussions of emerging woody biomass markets for energy, yet they will likely be principal suppliers of the resource.  Surveys administered to 475 forest landowners before and after an Extension Forestry education program in 10 counties across North Carolina indicated that landowners have low knowledge levels of woody biomass.  However, as a result of participating in the training, landowners increased knowledge, had more positive attitudes, and developed aspirations to harvest woody biomass on their land. Extension professionals can use our training model to develop similar woody biomass educational programs.

Authors:
Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University:  Jasmine Shaw, Graduate Student; Dennis Hazel, Associate Professor and Extension Specialist; Robert Bardon, Associate Professor and Extension Specialist

Department of Agricultural and Extension Education, North Carolina State University: K.S.U. Jayaratne, State Leader for Program Evaluation and Assistant Professor

Read the complete article in the Journal of Extension - Vol 50 num 4.

For more information, contact:  Robert Bardon, Extension Forestry

Sunday, September 2, 2012

Warnings ignored in Range Fuels debacle

http://www.ajc.com/news/business/warnings-ignored-in-range-fuels-debacle/nR2H8/

Posted: 7:30 a.m. Sunday, Sept. 2, 2012
By Dan Chapman 

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution 

It was the weekend before Christmas 2008 and Hosein Shapouri, a senior economist with the U.S. Department of Agriculture in Washington, was ordered to work.

His bosses needed an analysis done quickly of a proposed wood-to-ethanol factory in mid-Georgia. The Bush administration was leaving office the following month, and USDA officials wanted the deal sealed by then, Shapouri surmised.

In a blistering critique obtained by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Shapouri labeled the proposed Range Fuels plant “a high risk venture” that should raise “a red flag.” Three weeks later, top USDA officials approved the guarantee anyway.

Today, the Georgia plant’s failure is well-documented. The Soperton facility closed last year without producing a drop of usable ethanol. Taxpayers lost at least $75 million.

But an in-depth analysis by the AJC reveals that taxpayer money for Range Fuels was approved despite repeated warnings and strong opposition by some of the federal officials who vetted the project.

Other officials nonetheless favored giving Range access to as much as $162 million, including $6.2 million from the state of Georgia, according to documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act.

Government support for alternative energy has become a hot-button political issue, pitting the promise of energy independence against the prudent use of tax dollars. Both the Bush and Obama administrations strongly supported Range, which was expected to showcase the feasibility of cellulosic ethanol, as did politicians of both parties keen to bring jobs to Georgia.
 
Washington continues to hand out grants and guarantees for the commercially unproven technology, which attempts to turn wood pulp, not corn, into fuel for cars and trucks. Last month, USDA approved a $99 million loan guarantee for a North Carolina grass-to-fuel factory.

Critics say giving taxpayer dollars to deep-pocketed corporations and billionaire entrepreneurs like Vinod Khosla, the primary financial backer for Range Fuels, is folly. They liken the Range fiasco to the failure of Solyndra, the solar energy project that received $535 million in federal guarantees and produced only political heat for the Obama administration.

“Solyndra had a lack of due diligence just as Range Fuels did,” said Sam Shelton, founding director of the Strategic Energy Institute at Georgia Tech. “It really hurts me to see Energy and Agriculture department moneys poured down the drain. Government should be involved in a lot of things, but commercialization of technologies isn’t one of them.”

The documents obtained by the AJC show that three USDA officials who vetted the project approved it. Three opposed it. And three others who made critical comments had their opinions redacted.
Federal officials say they learned valuable lessons from the Range Fuels collapse and have established safeguards to prevent recurrences.

“While the Agency is disappointed that this one company did not succeed … it is important to remember that USDA has a long history of successful lending that supports rural homeowners, business owners, utilities and cooperatives,” the agency said in a statement e-mailed to the AJC. The USDA says the delinquency rate on more than 1 million loans is a scant 2.16 percent, although relatively few involve alternative energy.

Shapouri, now retired, said decision-makers dismissed Range’s many, easily detectable faults.
“Nobody ever expected them to produce anything,” he said in an interview. “I told them not to finance it. They didn’t listen to me. They decided to rush, rush, rush and give them the money.

 Push for alternatives

2007 was a heady time for the alternative energy industry, especially cellulosic ethanol projects that promised to turn Georgia’s abundance of pine trees into liquid gold while weaning the nation from imported oil and corn-based ethanol. Khosla, the billionaire co-founder of computer giant Sun Microsystems, announced in February the construction of the nation’s first pine-scrap-to-ethanol factory in Soperton, about 155 miles southeast of Atlanta.

Three weeks later U.S. Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman unveiled $385 million in grants to six cellulosic ethanol projects around the country, including $76 million for Range.

A University of Georgia study estimated the economic impact to struggling Treutlen County at $106 million a year. Nearly 200 people would find work at the factory, with suppliers and at nearby businesses.

With its lender, AgSouth Farm Credit in Statesboro, the Colorado company applied for an $80 million loan guarantee via the 2008 Farm bill. Such loan guarantees allow projects to arrange risk-free financing.

Between 2002 and 2006, Range’s technology had undergone 12,000 hours of testing in Colorado, using a variety of raw materials and operating conditions, according to the company’s feasibility study obtained by the AJC. But Range withheld some details, calling them “proprietary.”

Kevin Hicks, a USDA biofuels expert who helped review the loan guarantee, wrote in March 2009 that he and some colleagues didn’t have enough information and questioned plowing millions of dollars into so much unproven technology.

“Building a new manufacturing facility with one or two new processes is a risk,” the USDA researchers wrote. “Building a new facility with 51 percent new processes presents enormous risk.”

Hicks, who declined comment for this article, and colleagues added that “numerous other technical challenges exist.” Still, they wrote, the project has “merit and is more advanced in its planning than many of the other second generation biofuel projects to this date.” His final opinion was among those redacted.

‘Red flag’ raised

Even Range backers voiced concerns. Judy Raskind, a USDA rural development official, said in documents obtained by the AJC, “the risks and uncertainties of these still unproven technologies are consequential.” Nonetheless, Raskind “strongly recommended” that Range receive the guarantee.

“The opportunities for Range Fuels to be successful are strong,” she wrote. The “project is considered by the industry to have the greatest chance for success because of its robust economic viability and strong financial backing.”

Georgia officials, for their part, wholeheartedly supported a $6.2 million grant for the venture, mainly for the purchase of machinery. Treutlen County gave the company nearly 100 acres and tax abatements worth $33 million.

Yet a September 2007 memo from the Georgia Department of Community Affairs, obtained by the AJC via an open records request, noted that “the research is still years away from being completed and as of yet is unproven.”

Some federal scientists suspected Range wouldn’t be able to produce any ethanol, only methanol, a cheap and common additive used in plastics, paints, fuel and windshield wiper fluid.

By 2008 Range had scaled back production estimates from 40 million gallons of ethanol and 9 million gallons of methanol a year to 12 million gallons each.

The shift “should raise a red flag to any additional federal funding of the project until the discrepancy is resolved,” Shapouri, the USDA economist, wrote.

Hicks and fellow researchers also predicted that, by the time the federal money ran out, the “plant will probably not make ethanol on an economically viable basis.” Later, the USDA approved the switch-over to majority methanol production.



“That’s when the first alarm bell should’ve gone off,” said Robert Rapier, a chemical engineer whose R-Squared blog is widely read across the energy industry. “They went from promising something that had never been done before to something that was invented a hundred years ago.”

Range’s finances also raised red flags. Anthony Ashby, a USDA loan analyst who opposed the project, said Range lacked “cash flow” and needed more money before proceeding to later production phases, creating “a high level of risk for the government.”


Ben Anderson, one of USDA’s top administrators for rural development programs, said that Range’s financing was “not consistent” with the agency’s lending rules for alternative energy projects.

“The financing structure provides the potential for a larger Federal Government risk and exposure,” Anderson, who also opposed the project, wrote in January 2009.

After missing a production deadline and struggling financially, Range finally raised enough money by February 2010 for USDA to issue the loan guarantee. But technical difficulties plagued the plant throughout the year. A major investor pulled out.

The Soperton factory was mothballed in late 2010. The Energy Department terminated its agreement with Range thereby “reducing future financial risk for the American taxpayers.”

The agency said the final steps in producing usable ethanol “could not be successfully demonstrated with the time and funding available in this project.”

Lessons learned

USDA now requires more technical and financial information before, and after, approval of a loan guarantee.

“Obviously, hindsight is perfect,” said Brian Williamson, deputy commissioner of the Georgia Department of Community Affairs. “If we got the same deal tomorrow, we would use what we experienced from Range and learn from it.”

Another alternative energy company — also backed by Khosla — bought the foreclosed factory for $5.1 million and plans to produce ethanol via a different method. Williamson said the new company - which is using the taxpayer-funded machinery, but not getting additional aid - expects to one day honor the job-creation goals that triggered Georgia’s grant to Range Fuels.

The breakdown of taxpayer losses includes $43.6 million from DOE and $32 million from USDA. Georgia’s loss is $6.2 million - unless the factory’s new owners succeed.

The Energy and Agriculture departments continue to make loans to still-unproven cellulosic ethanol and other renewable energy ventures. Over the last two years, the agencies have dispensed more than $500 million in loan guarantees for projects that promise to turn solid waste, animal fat and cooking oil into fuel.

And, in August 2011, the Obama administration announced the investment of $510 million to produce specialized biofuels to fuel military and civilian planes and vehicles.

Khosla declined comment for this story. Earlier this year, though, he told the AJC, “you have to take risks to do any innovation and have breakthroughs in cost … The whole role of the Energy Department program was to encourage innovation. People forget that.”

Rapier, the energy expert and Khosla critic, said only scientifically sound projects are worthy of federal funding.


“But if you go out there, and make claims and take taxpayer money and don’t deliver,” he added, “you hurt the ability to raise money for realistic projects and you sour taxpayers on biofuels.”


RANGE FUELS TIMELINE

February 2007 — California dot-com billionaire Vinod Khosla announces the nation’s first wood-to-ethanol plant to be built in Soperton, Ga. The Range Fuels plant also receives $76 million from U.S. Department of Energy.
November 2007 – Groundbreaking for cellulosic ethanol factory.
December 2008 — Federal researchers and economists review Range’s proposal for an $80 million loan guarantee from the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
January 2009 — USDA conditionally approves loan guarantee.
February 2010 – USDA fully issues the loan guarantee.
December 2010 – A major investor pulls out. The DOE quits giving money to Range.
January 2011 – Soperton factory ceases operation and Range soon declares bankruptcy.
January 2012 – Foreclosed factory is sold for $5.1 million.

How we got the story:
Dan Chapman has followed the Range Fuels saga ever since the Colorado company announced in early 2007 the construction of an alternative energy factory in mid-Georgia. When the company went bankrupt and closed, the AJC dug deeper into the company’s finances and its ability to tap $600 million in state and federal grants and loans for a variety of alternative energy projects across the country. This year the AJC issued a flurry of open records requests for federal and state documents to understand why Range was given the OK to tap $162 million. Chapman reviewed more than 2,000 pages of documents.