Thursday, January 12, 2012

Second Try: LanzaTech Grabs Failed Biofuel Refinery in Georgia Pine

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2012/01/12019-range-lanzatech-cellulosic-biofuel-ethanol/

A biofuel plant in Soperton, Georgia.
Range Fuels attracted millions of dollars from private investors and both the Bush and Obama administrations before the failure of its Soperton, Georgia advanced biofuel plant. New Zealand's LanzaTech aims to coax success out of the plant with a different technology.
Photograph courtesy LanzaTech

Josie Garthwaite
Published January 19, 2012

The sandy soils of central Georgia nurture growth of bunchy wiregrass and longleaf pine. Here between the blackwater Ohoopee and Oconee rivers, about 160 miles (260 kilometers) southeast of Atlanta, a fortune has been sunk in hope of converting the abundant local biomass into fuel.

One of the more spectacular failures in the renewable energy industry—the Range Fuels collapse—played out here. Less renowned than the bankruptcy of Solyndra last September, Range’s failure that same month similarly involved the loss of millions of dollars in U.S. government funds and private investment, all wagered on an innovation that promised to propel an old technology to an exciting new level.

But where bankruptcy seems to have spelled the end for Solyndra and that California solar company’s technology, a new chapter is now being written in the effort to brew advanced biofuel in the “Million Pines City” of Soperton, Georgia.

Earlier this month, a New Zealand-based carbon-capture and energy startup called LanzaTech bought Range Fuels’ idle biorefinery in a foreclosure auction for just $5.1 million. That’s a bargain basement price, considering the money that Range Fuels had attracted from private investors and from both the Bush and Obama administrations for its cellulosic ethanol plant here: more than $160 million in venture capital, a $76 million grant from the U.S. Department of Energy in 2007, a $6.25 million grant from Georgia in 2008, and an $80 million loan guarantee from the U.S. Department of Agriculture in 2009.

LanzaTech says it has a business plan and technology that can coax success out of the Range Fuels plant. And one of the primary backers of LanzaTech’s efforts here is the same venture capitalist who helped bankroll and promote Range, technology investor Vinod Khosla. It’s now up to LanzaTech to see if it can turn the promise of Soperton into a real success for advanced biofuels and investors like Khosla.

High Hopes for Cellulosic

Producing ethanol from cellulosic plant sources has been seen as the Holy Grail of the renewable fuel industry. The U.S. corn belt may have perfected the art of fermenting its crop to produce fuel alcohol, but controversy abounds over the water use, the energy input for cultivating corn, and the limits and long-term viability of turning an edible product into fuel. That’s why President George Bush, in his 2006 State of the Union address, pledged to fund research to commercialize ethanol from non-edible plant material by 2012. Cellulosic ethanol companies also were in the first wave of alternative energy technologies backed by President Obama.

Although cellulosic ethanol can be produced in the laboratory and at pilot scale, the genetically engineered enzymes or heat needed to break down the plant material into sugars is expensive. Not a single company has succeeded in scaling up commercial cellulosic ethanol production in the United States six years after President Bush’s vow.

Oil companies in fact were fined $6.8 million in 2011 for failure to meet the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s requirement that 6.6 million gallons of cellulosic ethanol be blended into gasoline and diesel last year. Indeed, that target marked a dramatic scaling back of the goal Congress set in 2007. Lawmakers originally envisioned that 250 million gallons of cellulosic biofuel would be helping to fuel U.S. vehicles by 2011. Although that goal proved overly ambitious (in part because Range Fuels failed to meet production estimates), it would have displaced only a small fraction of oil dependence in a nation that burned 8.8 million barrels, or 370 million gallons, of motor gasoline per day in 2011, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

If things had gone as planned when Congress was setting cellulosic ethanol goals, a large volume of that advanced biofuel would have been produced in Soperton, the only incorporated town in Treutlen County, Georgia.

Range Fuels (formerly called Kergy, Inc.), of Broomfield, Colorado, set out to establish a biorefinery here that would produce 100 million gallons of cellulosic ethanol per year. There would be plenty of feedstock in the “Million Pines City," named after a local plantation where, in the late 1920s, a cotton farmer pioneered the cultivation of pine trees as a crop. Today, pine tree plantations dominate the landscape, and forestry makes up some 80 percent of all land use.

Range had a two-step process. First, it would use heat, pressure, and steam to produce synthetic gas from biomass. Step two would be converting the gas to ethanol using chemical catalysts.

Construction began in an industrial park here in November 2007, but by 2009 Range Fuels had fallen behind and dramatically reined in production goals. In August 2010, the company squeezed out its first batch of methanol, a wood alcohol fuel used in racing and some industrial applications. (Range Fuels said at the time that its methanol would be used to produce biodiesel.) But the facility ran into technical problems with the gasifiers and the system for feeding in biomass, and it never did produce any cellulosic ethanol that would substitute for the corn ethanol now used in cars and trucks.

Range Fuels closed the plant in January 2010, and filed for bankruptcy in September 2011. At the time of its failure, it had received only half of its expected federal grant and loan guarantee monies, amounting to a loss of more than $85 million in public funds. The USDA required the foreclosure sale this month to recoup some of its losses. “LanzaTech is just looking to capitalize on a bargain, really,” said Andrew Soare, an alternative fuels analyst with the research firm Lux Research.

The fact that Range Fuels and LanzaTech share a lead investor—Vinod Khosla’s Khosla Ventures—has raised eyebrows because LanzaTech bought the Soperton site for a fraction of the amount spent developing the facility. And both companies have talked about big dreams for the site. 

“Right now the equipment is sized on the order of 4 million gallons,” LanzaTech CEO Jennifer Holmgren said in an interview. “But, you know, some day I’d like to build bigger units there. It’s a lot of land. It’s a lot of wood residue. That site’s really not meant for a little facility. I can imagine making 100 million gallons of fuel there,” perhaps within five years.

A New Approach

However, the companies differ when it comes down to the process for transforming the biomass of Treutlen County, bordered by the Ohoopee and Oconee rivers, two tributaries of the mighty Altamaha. LanzaTech, which has named the old Range Fuels site Freedom Pines Biorefinery, plans to use a gasifier to produce synthetic gas from biomass. That much is the same. But while Range Fuels planned to use chemical catalysts for the next step, LanzaTech’s technology uses microbes (specialized through genetic modification and arrested evolution) to ferment the syngas.

At Freedom Pines, LanzaTech intends to initially produce chemicals such as butanol and propanol, rather than ethanol, which sells in high volume but is a product that results in a relatively low profit margin, Soare said. This is new ground for LanzaTech. Since its founding in 2005, LanzaTech has concentrated its efforts mainly on capturing carbon monoxide from industrial flues, and using its proprietary microbes to convert the gas into ethanol fuel.

“Our organism gets carbon and energy from a carbon monoxide molecule,” Holmgren said. “One of the best places to find carbon monoxide is in steel mills,” where the gas would normally be flared and released into the atmosphere as carbon dioxide. And one of the best places to find steel mills, she added, is China, which produces about half the world’s steel.

In Shanghai, LanzaTech recently started up a 100,000-gallon-per-year demo with Bao Steel. Speaking in a phone call from New Zealand, where 50 of LanzaTech’s 85 employees are based, Holmgren said LanzaTech’s first commercial facility would most likely be in China, with construction beginning as early as next year. LanzaTech also has industrial partners in India, where it’s using municipal solid waste as a feedstock. And in partnership with Virgin Atlantic, Swedish Biofuels, Boeing, and others, LanzaTech has also begun developing a renewable jet fuel using its microbe-based carbon-capture system.

LanzaTech’s acquisition of the Soperton facility will give the company a new measure of independence, according to Holmgren. “Imagine our situation,” she said. “We’re very excited about our work in the chemicals area, but the demos and commercial facilities are controlled by partners. And so we would have to ask them for permission. We would have to come to an agreement,” to begin proving LanzaTech's technology for biochemical production at any significant scale. “Why would somebody operating this big ethanol plant care about us showing our technology or doing all the process that’s required to deliver a chemicals play, right? We feel that as a company, we need to have the ability to control the larger asset.”

It’s a Gas

At the Freedom Pines Biorefinery, LanzaTech will be tackling a whole new process: the gasification step, which was such a headache for Range Fuels. Through its steel mill partners, Soare said, LanzaTech has “access to free feedstock. So it’s surprising to see them go after this. But in the context of how cheap it was, it did make sense.”

LanzaTech plans to try fixing the Range Fuels gasifier. If that fails, Holmgren said, LanzaTech will bring in a new gasifier from a partner. As Soare put it, “They’re not a gasification company. If they can’t get the gasifier to work, they’ll move on.” Soare expects that LanzaTech will spend no more than a few million dollars working on the old gasifier.

Either way, moving into chemicals production strikes Soare as a shrewd strategy that could position LanzaTech for some lucrative deals down the road. “Syngas to ethanol is a very challenging step,” he said. About a dozen companies are working on syngas to ethanol globally, and a few dozen are working on cellulosic ethanol generally. “If gasification companies are unsuccessful, like Range, and if LanzaTech shows its organism works, there could be licensing or acquisition opportunities. Competitors will likely look to LanzaTech to help them switch to chemical production if LanzaTech can demonstrate its technology works at the Soperton plant.”

As for the U.S. government’s hopes for cellulosic ethanol to enter the fuel market this year, the EPA’s analysis is that there are six U.S. companies—each with a differing technology—that could produce the advanced biofuel in 2012. Therefore, the EPA set a goal of blending 8.65 million gallons of cellulosic ethanol into motor fuel this year, over objections from the oil industry that technology wasn’t available for producing that volume. The EPA said the goal was important to ensure a viable market for cellulosic ethanol, and the growth of the industry as Congress intended.

At this point, not a drop is expected to come from Range Fuels’ former biorefinery, which the EPA had projected would contribute 1 million gallons of cellulosic fuel to the U.S. energy mix in 2011. The agency is counting on no fuel production at Soperton in 2012.

This story is part of a special series that explores energy issues. For more, visit The Great Energy Challenge.

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

The March on Georgia: Renmatix raises $50M; LanzaTech buys Range Fuels site

http://www.biofuelsdigest.com/bdigest/2012/01/04/the-march-on-georgia-renmatix-raises-50m-lanzatech-buys-range-fuels-site/

| January 4, 2012 
 Renmatix and LanzaTech announce major advances in Georgia on the same day. Big Mo’? What does it all mean?
 
Our old friend, Brian Westlake, re-surfaces again to help us figure it all out, and delve into the real story.

“Well, g’day, g’day, g’day, what’s all this confusion about Renmatix and LanzaTech?” So began my friend Brian Westlake.

“Jim, I figured you’d call, completely stumped as usual. Let’s sort you out, matey, and quickly. Let’s make it quick. The waves here at Byron Bay are compelling. Now, what exactly are you hearing about LanzaTech?”

I explained that in Georgia, LanzaTech bought the Range Fuels Soperton site for $5.1 million at an auction yesterday at the property.

“And yer question is ‘what’s the value proposition?’ Is this something Vinod Khosla shoved down their throats? Something along those lines, ay?”

Yep. Although there been some confusion, I mentioned, as to whether LanzaTech bought RangeFuels or just the Georgia site.

“Bought Range Fuels? That’s total bollocks, mate. You’ve been reading ICIS again. The company wasn’t up for auction, it was just the site.”

Range Fuels Rewind

 

For a moment, we went through the Range timeline. Range Fuels closed its doors last fall after attempts failed to refinance, or sell the company as a whole. Range had stopped making payments on its government-guaranteed loans, and found its payments under a DOE grant suspended after the company had ultimately failed in its demonstration project, which called for the catalytic conversion of syngas into ethanol.

“And you think Vinod is behind this?”

Well, people are talking.

“Aw, Jim, you need to get to know these people better. Not Vinod’s style to impose on his CEOs. Not Jennifer Holmgren’s style to lead her company down a path that advantaged one investor.”

OK, I can buy that.

$25M in infrastructure for a $5.1M check

 

“Here’s the thing. It’s a $5.1 million deal for, I don’t know, $20 or $25 million in site value. Jennifer would tell you, “why be patient?” when you can get all that, for that, and right away, instead of waiting 12-24 months for Christmas.”

But, she could have bought the project directly via the USDA. Why run the auction risk?

“Not at that price, cobber. Now, you’ve got this all wrong.  Consider this acquisition similar to the LS9 deal.

Where that company picked up a 12 Mgy capacity site and fermentation infrastructure in Florida, last year, for under $3M, by cherry-picking a site out of foreclosure?

“There you go, much better already.”

Son of the Range gasifier

 

But what’s LanzaTech going to do with the Range Fuels gasifier?

“Ah, that’s right. Everyone’s got their knickers in a knot over the troubled Range gasifier, now in LanzaTech’s possession. But you don’t  need it, don;t you see. Whether it can produce beyond the 125 tons per day of biomass or so that it did demonstrate, well it's academic at the price they acquired the site.”

Academic?

“Jim, don’t you see? LanzaTech’s phone must be ringing off the hook with gasifier companies, vying for a partnership with LanzaTech. Especially now that they have branched out beyond industrial off-gases. Sean Simpson’s microorganism – and you know as a ridgy-didge Aussie I don’t hand out lollipops to Kiwis just for fun – that bug could well aim for other higher-value chemicals.

Isn’t LanzaTech looking more and more like Coskata?

 

“LanzaTech has one advantage you’re overlooking, They don’t have themselves embroiled in a trade secret dispute with INEOS Bio. But you’re missing the big picture. It’s not about Coskata. For that matter, there’s INEOS Bio active in that space, not to mention MSW-to-ethanol players such as Terrabon, Enerkem and Fulcrum, or wood-to-ethanol projects like Mascoma or American Process. It really doesn’t have much to do with all that.

So, what’s it about?

 

“Catch a clue, old mate. LanzaTech needs its own house, You’re all tied up in whether this is Vinod somehow escaping his fate on Range.

Their own house.

“Yeah. Let’s take the site LanzaTech is developing with Bao Steel in China to take advantage of waste gases from steel production.

Nice project that one.

“Well, try explaining to your new Chinese partners that you want to do some scale-up investigation on a new feedstock, one that isn’t off-gases from a steel blast furnace.”

Problematic, yes.

“Problematic?? Apoplectic! But you owe the duty to the LT shareholder to investigate all the possibilities inherent in the micro-organism. So there’s the problem of mixed objectives, disagreements and problems, avoided.”

What about jet fuel?

 

“And there’s another point. You’re coffee must be kicking in. It’s a site that can be utilized to make low-cost jet fuel from wood biomass in the US, for sale to the US military. Not to mention the bloody RFS.

The Renewable Fuel Standard


How is the RFS mixed up in this?

“You complete nimrod, how are you going to qualify a fuel made from industrial off-gases under RFS, when it specifies you have to make it from biomass? Where’s the biomass in a blast furnace?”

Ah.

Over to Renmatix


“Righto, I think we have you straightened out on that one. Now, what about Renmatix? What don’t you understand about that one?

Well, BASF announced plans to invest $30 million in the US technology firm Renmatix, as part of a new $50 million Series C investment round announced yesterday by Renmatix.

“Too right. Smart gang there at BASF. You didn’t believe me back in November when I said that BASF chairman Kurt Bock practically put it on a silver platter for you.

That’s right, what did they say?

“Only that they aim to grow 2 percentage points above chemical production and thus increase sales by an average of 6 percent per year until 2020. That’s a target of 115 billion euros. And they’re targeting emerging markets. And they are all over the sustainability angle. “Sustainability is becoming one of the main drivers of growth and value creation,” they said. Do you you need me to draw a map for you? They’re going to be looking at this sector to help them drive massive growth. That’s what I told you in November. You need to get the wax out of your ears.”

The Russians are coming

 

But who are the other investors? They raised $50 million, what about the other $20 million?

“Well, matey of mine, think Russia, that’s all I can tell you.”

Russia?

“They are streaming out of Russia, high net worths. China too. It’s built around key individuals, not some faceless Pushkin Equity Partners or Dostoyevsky Capital. Your CEOs and their boards will have to be all over them, but Renmatix clearly got the jump on a few companies. Wink-wink.”

What this country needs is a good five-cent sugar

 

What’s everyone’s interest in the low-cost cellulosic sugars that Renmatix makes? Why the heat right now?

“How dense can you be, Jimbo? If Renmatix’ technology works at scale, its a new game. Those are 4-cent sugars they propose to produce. Per pound. That’s well less than 40 cents per gallon for the feedstock. That’s like getting, say, 100,000 tons per year out of a full-scale Renmatix plant at the something like $20-$30 per bone dry ton of biomass. Plus, they’re talking less than $1.25 per gallon in capital costs. Total game-changers, those low-cost sugar companies. Keep your eye on all of them. Comet, Proterro, even Bluefire is getting into it.”

$20 per bone-dry tone. That’s cheap.

“Too right it is. I think Coskata is working with $55 per ton in its IPO, for a fuel that has an OPEX of $1.50 or less per gallon, according to the Coskata IPO.  You do the maths.”

What’s the Series C investment going towards – what do you hear?

“Don’t you talk to anyone anymore, Jim? Ask Mike Hamilton, the CEO over at Renmatix. Part of it will be equity, and there’ll be some technical development on other biomass.”

The BASF partnership

 

What about the relationship with BASF?

“Too soon to tell, isn’t it. They’ll both want a long-term relationship. Whether, and how, that spills over to a customer relationship, or technical partnership, that remains to be seen, ay?

Validating the industry

 

What do you think it says about Renmatix?

“It’s a complete validator of the technology. I mean, BASF, it’s not like they just parachuted into the space yesterday. It’s a $100 billion revenue company, with 100,000 people. They’re bigger than the global biofuels industry, all by their onesy. They’ve been watching it carefully, and putting their strategy together, for years. And they do their due diligence. That’s not someone else’s money they’re investing here – it’s hard yakka, making money in the chemicals business,. They’re not putting it into Renmatix on a finger-crossed basis. They are selective and diligent. But, it validates the whole space, really.”

Low-cost cellulosic sugars?

“No, you complete dolt, the whole space of biofuels and biomaterials. Look beyond how they are making the sausage – in this case, with a low-cost cellulosic sugar – and look at what they are trying to make. If BASF thought for a minute like those flaming idiots at the Wall Street Journal that there’s no hope in cellulose’s, this wouldn’t have happened.”

So, why Renmatix?

“It has to be the new management. Technology’s remarkable the same. Mike Hamilton’s an old sea dog in the chemicals business. They speak the same language now, as BASF. Sustainability. It’s a buzzword, but when you drill that down to providing a product from renewables at costs comparable to the old fossil fuels boys, Renmatix and BASF are completely on the same page. Everyone sees where it’s going, as far as the long-term value of trusting your company to the idea that someone ids going to be able to push a couple more holes in the ground and keep supplying you with low-cost fossil fuels, forever. It’s a non-starter.”


Cellulosics and the Journal

 

Er, what about those flaming idiots at the Wall Street Journal?

“Matey, it’s the editorial board. Do they ever come out of the cave? Their reporters are the real deal. But I wonder about that editorial page. That paper used to be about what companies like Dow, Dupont, Waste Management, and BASF were thinking. These days, the Journal must think that half the companies in their own Index are completely off their rocker. Here in Sydney we have the Financial Times, and they’re not making the same mistake. Everyone is jumping in.

“Which reminds me, time to jump back into the surf. We’re up at Byron, the surf is incredible. 1.5 meter swell from the east, should be over two meters by the weekend. Time to go now, over and out.”