Thursday, August 15, 2013

KiOR Inc : The Rosen Law Firm Announces Investigation of Securities Claims Against KiOR, Inc. - KIOR

http://www.4-traders.com/KIOR-INC-8257865/news/KiOR-Inc-The-Rosen-Law-Firm-Announces-Investigation-of-Securities-Claims-Against-KiOR-Inc-KIOR-17194125/

08/15/2013 | 02:05pm US/Eastern


The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. announces that it is investigating potential securities claims against KiOR, Inc. (NASDAQ: KIOR) resulting from allegations that the Company may have issued materially inaccurate statements about the Company's financial condition and prospects.

On May 9, 2013, KiOR held an earnings call where the Company's CEO Fred Cannon forecasted that total fuel production for its Columbus facility would be between 300,000 and 500,000 gallons during the second quarter of 2013, which is in line with the Company's estimate of producing between 3 to 5 million gallons of fuel for 2013. On August 8, 2013, KiOR disclosed that it had only shipped 75,000 gallons of fuel from this facility during the second quarter. As a result, KiOR announced revenue of only $240,000 for the quarter, approximately 12% of the $1.93 million average of five analysts' estimates compiled by Bloomberg. On this news, KiOR shares fell from a closing of $4.76 per share on August 7, 2013 to $2.89 on August 13, 2013.

The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a securities class action lawsuit on behalf of KiOR investors. If you purchased KiOR stock prior to August 8, 2013 please visit the website at http://www.rosenlegal.com to join the class action. You may also contact Phillip Kim, Esq. or Kevin Chan, Esq. of The Rosen Law Firm toll free at 866-767-3653 or via e-mail at pkim@rosenlegal.com or kchan@rosenlegal.com.

The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.



The Rosen Law Firm P.A.
Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
Kevin Chan, Esq.
275 Madison Avenue 34th Floor
New York, New York 10016
Tel: 212-686-1060
Toll Free: 1-866-767-3653
Fax: 212-202-3827
lrosen@rosenlegal.com
pkim@rosenlegal.com
kchan@rosenlegal.com
www.rosenlegal.com

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Petroleum Industry: Relax Biofuel Requirements

http://wallstcheatsheet.com/stocks/petroleum-industry-relax-biofuel-requirements.html/?a=viewall

Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Tilbury Power Station completes final day of operation

http://biomassmagazine.com/articles/9311/tilbury-power-station-completes-final-day-of-operation

By Erin Voegele | August 13, 2013

The U.K.’s largest biomass power plant is completing its final day of operation. RWE npower has announced that the 750 MW Tilbury Power Station will generate power for the last time on Aug. 13.

The facility, originally fueled with coal, operated for 46 years.

In 2008, RWE made the decision to opt out the then 1,100 MW coal-fired power plant under the E.U.’s Large Combustion Plant Directive, a regulation that aims to reduce sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and particulate matter emissions from power stations and other large industrial facilities. The decision to opt-out meant that the plant would shut down after either 20,000 hours of operation or the end of 2015, whichever was sooner. However, in 2010, RWE elected to use the remaining hours of operation to trial the use of 100 percent biomass.  The action effectively reduced the plant’s production capacity to 750 MW. The conversion was completed in late 2011.

According to information released by RWE on Aug. 12, the second phase of the conversion would have required the closure of the plant under the LCPD and the development of a full-scale biomass conversion to meet new environmental standards. It would have taken approximately two years to complete the upgrades. Information released by the company specifies the move would have allowed the plant to operate for an additional 10 to 12 years.

According to the RWE, the U.K. Department of Climate Change confirmed that the TIlbury project is ineligible for the new Contract for Difference Support mechanism for lower carbon technologies. As such, the company said it will not proceed with the second phase of the conversion. RWE attributes the decision to the fact that the conversion is not economically viable under the existing Renewable Obligation mechanism.

Recent statistics released by the U.K. Department of Energy and Climate Change indicate that power generation from plant biomass in the U.K. increased by 69 percent during the first quarter of 2013 compared to the same quarter of the prior year, rising from 1.1 terawatt hours (TWh) to 1.8 TWh. The increase is attributed to the Tilbury power plant becoming fully operational.

Data provided by RWE states that the Tilbury plant generated 1.27 TWh of power during the first quarter of this year. That is more than 10 percent of the 12.4 TWh of total renewable electricity generated in the U.K. during the same three-month period.

“This is a sad time for everyone at Tilbury Power Station, but I would like to personally thank all of our staff past and present who have contributed to the success of the station, particularly in the delivery of such a pioneering development for UK biomass,” said Nigel Staves, manager of Tilbury Power Station. “Tilbury remains an excellent site for power generation and RWE will now review future plans for the site. The lessons learned from the successful biomass conversion will be shared across the RWE Generation portfolio, as RWE remains committed to exploring new energy technologies that can provide energy solutions that are both affordable and sustainable.”

KiOR Natchez facility on hold? Second Colombus plant may come first in company's plan

http://www.natchezdemocrat.com/2013/08/13/kior-natchez-facility-on-hold-second-columbus-plant-may-come-first-in-companys-plan/#


Petroleum groups ask EPA for relief from biofuel mandate

http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/316927-petroleum-groups-ask-epa-for-relief-from-biofuel-mandate

By Zack Colman - 08/13/13 06:07 PM ET

The petroleum industry formally asked the Obama administration on Tuesday to lower the amount of corn-based ethanol refiners must blend into transportation fuel in 2014.

Failing to adjust the Renewable Fuel Standard’s blending targets could result in “severe harm to the U.S. economy” resulting from higher gasoline prices, the American Petroleum Institute (API) and the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM) said in comments regarding a request for a waiver from the rule.

The groups' claim of economic damage relied on an API-commissioned NERA Economic Consulting study that said leaving the fuel mandate intact could raise diesel costs 300 percent and gasoline costs 30 percent in 2015.

The request from the oil trade organizations comes as the Environmental Protection Agency is showing it might bend on the fuel mandate.

Created in 2005 and expanded two years later, the rule calls for blending 36 billion gallons of biofuel into traditional transportation fuel by 2022. It’s at the center of an intense lobbying and political fight that’s drawing attention on Capitol Hill.

The EPA acknowledged last week that refiners could approach the “blend wall” in meeting the federal biofuel-blending mandate’s accelerating targets. It said it would consider tinkering with the requirements for next year to accommodate those concerns.

 
 That term refers to the point at which the oil industry says refiners would need to produce gasoline with higher ethanol concentrations than the market-standard 10 percent mix. 
 
In their formal waiver request, the groups asked the EPA to lower the Renewable Fuel Standard’s blending requirements to below 10 percent of gasoline to avoid the blend wall.

Honoring the waiver would eliminate 3.35 billion of the 18.15 billion gallons of corn-based ethanol called for in 2014, providing “short-term relief” from the rule, said Bob Greco, API downstream group director, in a statement.

The petroleum industry and automakers have warned fuel blends with a 15 percent ethanol concentration, known as E15, could damage car engines. They also say tankers and gas stations don’t have the infrastructure to support the fuel.

The biofuel industry has rejected those claims. It contends that E15 is safe, noting that the EPA has approved E15 for use in cars made in 2001 or later.

Biofuel groups pushed back against the waiver request, saying that it was designed to protect the profits of oil producers and refiners.

“The actions by API and AFPM are designed with one goal in mind — to eliminate any competition from clean, green biofuels in the liquid transportation fuels marketplace,” Tom Buis, chief executive of corn ethanol group Growth Energy, said in a Tuesday statement.

The EPA has so far rejected all previous Renewable Fuel Standard waiver requests, which have centered on the corn-based ethanol that dominates the biofuel market.

Last year, poultry and meat producers failed to secure a waiver when they argued the mandate was pushing corn prices upward and harming their businesses. And several state governors also unsuccessfully lobbied the EPA for relief on those grounds.

The waiver requests are just one example of how the mandate has come under fire in Washington, D.C.

The House Energy and Commerce Committee has pledged to overhaul the rule, saying that the mandate’s goals are unrealistic.

Corn-based ethanol has kept pace with original projections, but many next-generation biofuels have fallen well short of the marks Congress laid out when it expanded the mandate 2007.

Many lawmakers also say the intent of the law — to wean the U.S. off foreign fuels and drive down greenhouse gas emissions — can be accomplished with domestically produced natural gas and oil discovered since the rule was last updated.

But biofuel groups contend next-generation biofuels are just starting to come online in commercial quantities. They say changing the mandate would threaten economic development in rural communities that have come to depend on the biofuel industry.

— This story was updated at 2:56 p.m. on Aug. 14.

Monday, August 12, 2013

The Cellulosic Ethanol Industry Faces Big Challenges

http://www.technologyreview.com/news/517816/the-cellulosic-ethanol-industry-faces-big-challenges/

The advanced-biofuels industry is in danger of withering away.
A series of cellulosic-biofuel plants are finally starting to come on line after years of delay. But the new wave of plant openings, good news as it is for the emerging industry, also shows just how far it still has to go.

Last week, the chemical company Ineos started making ethanol from wood chips and other plant materials at a facility in Florida, that can produce up to 8.5 million gallons of fuel a year. By next year more than a dozen multimillion-gallon plants are scheduled to be finished in the U.S. Although the plants are considered commercial scale, they’re still relatively small compared with corn ethanol plants, which often produce 100 million gallons of fuel per year.

The facilities won’t come close to meeting the requirements set out by the 2007 renewable-fuel standard, which was central to President Bush’s efforts to bring fuels made from biomass to market.

What’s more, many of the new plants will struggle in an already saturated ethanol market.

Cellulosic biofuels, made from materials such as wood chips and corn stalks, were mandated as part of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. They were supposed to help end what Bush called America’s “addiction to oil.” The renewable-fuel standard called for a rapid increase in the amount of fuel that comes from conventional corn-based ethanol as well as cellulosic ethanol.

Corn ethanol production surged, but cellulosic-ethanol production has been delayed both by technical challenges and by a lack of funds for commercial plants. The renewable-fuel standard originally called for a billion gallons of cellulosic ethanol to be blended into the nation’s fuel supplies this year, but the Environmental Protection Agency has reduced the target to just six million gallons. Next year’s target is 1.75 billion, but the EPA is expected to set a new level based on what it expects companies can produce.

The new wave of biofuel plants will include a 25-million-gallon facility from the corn ethanol giant Poet and a 27.5-million-gallon facility from DuPont, but many of the others will produce 10 million gallons or less. It’s a small start. Meeting the ultimate goals of the renewable-fuel standard would require 300 biofuel plants, and each one would need to produce not 25 million gallons of fuel, but four times that amount.

Right now cellulosic ethanol can’t compete on its own. It costs more than either corn ethanol or gasoline. Wallace Tyner, a professor of agricultural economics at Purdue University, says cellulosic ethanol will never be cheaper than corn ethanol. However, Poet says it hopes to eventually make cellulosic ethanol competitive with gasoline. Getting to that point, at the very least, will require support from the renewable-fuel standard to help the company build more plants and achieve some economies of scale.

The standard has always been controversial (see “The Mess of Mandated Markets”). Right now, there’s a bill before the Senate that would repeal it. This year it’s also been the subject of a series of House hearings and white papers, and the leadership of the House Energy and Commerce Committee is now deciding how to proceed. The chairman of the committee, Republican Fred Upton of Michigan, introduced the most recent hearing by saying, “In my view, the current system cannot stand.”

“Killing the renewable-fuel standard kills whatever future there is for cellulosics,” Tyner says. For now, however, that probably isn’t a big concern: the standard is likely to remain in place, since it has the support of President Obama and many in the Senate.

In Tyner’s view, the industry faces another major challenge. “Cellulosic ethanol today is a nonstarter,” he says; there’s not enough demand for ethanol of any kind.

KiOR announces Q2 financial results, discusses expansion plans

http://biomassmagazine.com/articles/9308/kior-announces-q2-financial-results-discusses-expansion-plans/

By Erin Voegele | August 12, 2013
 
KiOR Inc. has released financial results for the second quarter, reporting operational progress at its Columbus, Miss., plant. The company shipped more than 75,000 gallons of cellulosic fuels during the three-month period, which ended June 30.

“I am happy to report that Columbus has made significant operational progress and is continuing to build its on-stream performance and reliability," said Fred Cannon, president and CEO of KiOR. "In addition to making our first shipment of cellulosic gasoline in the second quarter, we more than doubled the run time of our core technology, the Biomass Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit, to 43 percent in the quarter, up from 20 percent in the first quarter."

During a call to discuss the financial results, Cannon spoke about three phases he said are necessary to bring a first-of-king facility to a steady state of operation. First, there is a reliability phase that concentrates on simply running the facility and building its on-stream percentage, he said. Second is a throughput phase, which focuses bringing the facility to nameplate capacity while maintaining the on-stream percentage. Finally, the third phase focuses on optimization, during which process efficiency is optimized, increasing yield. According to Cannon, the facility has achieved significant progress of the first phase and is beginning to work on the second stage.

Cannon also noted that the plant’s CFCC unit operated for just under 40 days during the second quarter, which doubled the quarterly on-stream percentage. “Our first run was April 22 to April 27,” he said. “We then started the BFCC back up on May 6 and rant it until May 12. We decided to terminate both of these runs due to feed synchronization issues. Nothing about the KiOR technology prevented the runs from going longer.” The BFCC was brought back online on May 30 and operated through June 29. The 30-day run more than doubled the facility’s previous longest individual run.

According to Cannon, a small repair requirement in the wood yard necessitated the shutdown of that run.

He also stressed that nothing about the KiOR technology resulted in these operational terminations.

“As has been the case since we first started the facility, these issues are not related to our core technology,” Cannon continued. “They are simply part of the break-in process, and again, let me reiterate that our goal last quarter was to keep the plant running as long as possible, not to push the plant from a throughput standpoint. Our focus was on reliability, and we typically ran Columbus at 40 percent to 50 percent of its nameplate capacity.”

Cannon said longer runs are KiOR’s main objective in the third quarter. He also stressed that the plant is currently operating, with high quality oil being produced and stored. “I anticipate that the hydrotreater will start up shortly, meaning we will have fuel ready to ship in the very near term,” he said, noting that the company’s focus will likely not shift to process optimization and increasing yield until the fourth quarter. “I look for us to achieve normal, steady-state optimal operations at Columbus in the first half of 2014,” Cannon continued.

During the call, Cannon also spoke about KiOR’s long-term business plan, highlighting two developments that have factored into the company’s strategic thinking. “First, we believe that we have made some important gains in our research and development efforts that…can have a significant impact on the operating efficiency and catalyst performance of our technology at a commercial scale.” Second, Cannon said KiOR is beginning to see traction on the commercial development of feedstocks other than Southern Yellow Pine, including hardwood, energy crops and waste products.

Cannon said the company expects to be able to procure these alternative feedstocks at a lower price.

As a result of the two developments, combined with progress at the Columbus facility, Cannon said KiOR is considering an alternative growth strategy that would involve the construction of a second 500 bone-dry-ton-per-day facility adjacent to the existing Columbus plant. While Cannon stressed that the company is still in the early stages of evaluating the possible expansion, the move is exciting because it could reduce the cost and time required to design, engineer and construct the second facility. Cannon also said building a second plant adjacent to the Columbus plant would be expected to reduce start-up and commissioning risk as a result of shared experienced personnel, site infrastructure, equipment and operational knowledge. “On a preliminary basis, we expect that the total cost of this second 500 ton-per-day commercial facility in Columbus will range from $175 million to $225 million,” he said, noting that current estimates shows cellulosic gasoline and diesel could be produced at a cost of $2.60 to $2.80 per gallon at a yield of 72 gallons per bone dry ton. At a yield of 92 gallons per bone dry ton, the cost would drop to $2.20 to $2.30 per gallon.

KiOR has also continued to refine the design for its proposed facility in Natchez, Miss. According to Cannon, the current estimated cost to build that plant is $560 million to $600 million. “We also estimate that this facility will be able to produce cellulosic gasoline and diesel at a per-unit unsubsidized cost between $2.25 and $2.48 per gallon at our current yield of 72 gallons per bone dry ton, excluding cost of financing and facility depreciation,” he said. “This would decrease to between $1.81 and $1.96 per gallon at our short-term yield target of 92 gallons per ton.”

Regarding quarterly financial results, KiOR reported a net loss of $38.5 million, or 36 cents per share, compared to a net loss of $31.1 million, or 30 cents per share, during the previous quarter. During the second quarter of 2012. KiOR reported a net loss of $23 million, or 22 cents per share.
Revenues for the quarter equaled $239,000, up from $71,000 during the first quarter of the year. The company posted no revenues for the second quarter of 2012.